**UFBA**

# 0711.4360v2 arxiv

(Parte **1** de 3)

arXiv:0711.4360v2 [hep-ph] 20 Dec 2007

Two Higgs Models for Large tanβ and Heavy Second Higgs

Lisa Randall

Jefferson Physical Laboratory Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA randall@physics.harvard.edu

Abstract

We study two Higgs models for large tanβ and relatively large second Higgs mass. In this limit the second heavy Higgs should have small vev and therefore couples only weakly to two gauge bosons. Furthermore, the couplings to down type quarks can be significantly modified (so long as the second Higgs is not overly heavy). Both these facts have significant implications for search strategies at the LHC and ILC. We show how an effective theory and explicit fundamental two Higgs model approach are related and consider the additional constraints in the presence of supersymmetry or Z2 flavor symmetries. We argue that the best tests of the two Higgs doublet potential are likely to be measurements of the light Higgs branching fractions. We show how higher dimension operators that have recently been suggested to raise the light Higgs mass are probably best measured and distinguished in this way.

1 Introduction

Two Higgs models are perhaps the simplest alternative to the Standard Model. They are particularly important because they are essential to low-energy supersymmetry but they of course can occur in other models that allow a broader parameter range. The phenomenology of the neutral Higgs sector is slightly subtle since the angles from mass mixing are not in general the same as the angle associated with the relative vevs. However we will see that they generally align to a large extent when one Higgs is somewhat heavier, greatly simplifying the analysis of the implications.

In this paper we explore the phenomenology of two Higgs doublet models for large tanβ when the lighter Higgs h is light enough so that its decays are dominantly into bs whereas the second Higgs is somewhat heavy. We are motivated in part by the analysis of [1], which performed an operator analysis in the strongly interacting Higgs sector case to elucidate interesting effects that can occur when the light Higgs is part of a larger Higgs sector.

Similar considerations apply to two Higgs models, since the light Higgs is not exactly the eaten Goldstone boson in this case either.1 For example, we find growth in W scattering with energy though it corresponds to a higher order operator than in the strongly interacting Higgs models considered in Ref. [1] and is not the most significant deviation from Standard Model predictions.

The modification of the light Higgs coupling to bottom type quarks and charged leptons can be significant however for two Higgs doublet models. Although studying deviations in the light Higgs couplings from their Standard Model might not seem to be the best way to study a perturbative theory where the additional states are more likely to be kinematically accessible, we show that for a large parameter range the heavy Higgs will probably elude detection and precise measurements of light fields will be the best way to test the Higgs sector.

An operator analysis for two Higgses from a purely effective theory viewpoint was in fact completed in a recent paper [2] where it was shown that for large Yukawa coupling of the heavy Higgs to the down sector and small Yukawa of the heavy Higgs to the up sector one could find significant deviations in the Higgs partial widths for the light Higgs particle, even when the second heavy Higgs will elude direct detection. In this paper we relate the more conventional two Higgs analyses of Gunion and Haber [3] to the effective theory analysis of Mantry, Trott, and Wise [2]. We show that the conclusions reached in that paper (namely large corrections to b Yukawas and difficulties of finding a second Higgs) apply quite generally for large tanβ. We show that the assumption made there is in some sense less arbitrary than it might seem in that these characterizations apply to the Yukawa couplings for the heavy Higgs in the large tanβ limit.

We show however that if the dimension-4 operators respect the Z2 symmetry that guarantees a GIM mechanism that the Yukawa modifications are expected to be smaller since

1Note that we use the conventional notation where the scalar particles in the Higgs sector are called Higgs particles. Purists might restrict this term for the linear combination with a vacuum expectation value but since the fields mix it is easier to call them all by this term and to distinguish the light, heavy, and charged Higgses.

they are no longer enhanced by tanβ. However, we will see that the effects can still be quite significant. We also consider the relationship between deviations in bottom and tau branching ratios in the various doublet Higgs models that preserve a Z2 symmetry. Finally we are motivated by recent data that point to high supersymmetry breaking or a new physics scale motivating considering a relatively heavy second Higgs and higher effective dimension operators in the Higgs sector. We find that the higher effective dimension operators of [20] can generate large deviations in Higgs branching ratios and that these deviations in Yukawas are most likely the best way to test for the new operators they suggest. Furthermore, these deviations in Yukawas could distinguish among the different possible higher dimension operators that could in principle correct the light Higgs mass.

2 General Two Higgs Analysis

We will consider a two Higgs theory in the decoupling limit where one of the Higgs is assumed to be light (in the regime in which decays to bs dominate) and the other Higgs is assumed to be relatively heavy. We will use two parameterizations below, and use both mH and M to refer to the mass of the heavy Higgs.

Let us first parameterize the two Higgs Lagrangian with the notation of Gunion and

Haber [3] (see also [4,6]) but using the notation H1 and H2 for the two Higgs bosons. We have the gauge invariant scalar potential

We take all parameters to be real and CP-conserving for simplicity. In a supersymmetric model, these parameters take the values

Where λ345 = λ3 + λ4 + λ5. Notice that the last two parameters are zero in any model that respects a Z2 symmetry in the dimension-4 operators. We might expect this to be approximately the case in any of the standard two Higgs scenarios where an approximate

Z2 guarantees a GIM mechanism. However, breaking of the Z2 in the dimension-4 operators above can exist while still not introducing overly-large flavor changing effects [2,20]. As we will see such cases will lead to particularly interesting deviations from the Standard Model.

We now assume an appoximate Z2 symmetry and follow the standard notation and define the ratio of vevs of the two fields as tanβ = 〈H2〉/〈H1〉, where H2 is the field coupling to the top quarks and H1 is the field coupling to the bottom quarks and charged leptons (here we are assuming a Type I model where this is the case but we will explore later other assumptions).

The angle α determines the mixing angles of the Higgs fields mass eigenstates, so we have

where H is the heavy Higgs field and L is the light Higgs field and we are only considering the real parts of H1 and H2. Notice that with this parameterization the fields H and L have nonzero vevs, but this can be subtracted off as in [3].

The vevs for the two (real) Higgs fields (neglecting higher order terms in (v/mH)2 are given by

and

In the large tanβ limit, this reduces to λ = cosβ(−λ2 + λ345) + λ7 (9) and in a supersymmetric theory we would have

Alternatively in the limit that tanβ is large one can just solve for sinα (using the mass matrices from [3]) (see Eq. (15) below) to find

Expanding out cos(β − α) in Eq. (7) gives this same expression.

The equations above show that the masses and vevs are aligned up to O(v2/M2) corrections. The heavy Higgs gets a vev through its interaction with the light Higgs field that has acquired a larger vev. This would have been more manifest with different notation. For example, the vev of H1 is proportional to v cosβ whereas the coefficient of L is −sinα, so it might have been natural when the quartic term doesn’t dominate the mixing to have started with the rotated angle −sinα → cosα in the first place. Notice that the equations above imply that α ∼ β −π/2 in the extreme decoupling limit where tanβλv2/m2H < 1. Although perhaps not as likely to be physically relevant, we also consider the opposite limit, where the off-diagonal term in the mass matrix changes sign. In this case, the above results still hold for α and the vev of the heavy field, although when the λ7 term dominates sinα reverses sign. The answer above suffices over the entire parameter range but for completeness we com- pare the result to that of [3] in this limit, noting that the intermediate results can depend on convention.2 Ref. [3] gave α ∼ π/2 − β [3], sinα ∼ cosβ, which is the result when the initial conventions for the Lagrangian do not account for cosβ > 0. Minimizing the poten- tial with respect to φ1 (substituting in the assumed form for the H1 and H2 vevs) yields the equation [3]

When the λ7-dependent-term dominates, one needs negative cosβ to satisfy this equation. However, according to the [3] convention β is always between 0 and π/2. In order to maintain cosβ > 0 and m2 1 > 0 (when λ7 > 0), we need to change the sign of H1. With this sign change, we can directly solve for sinα (in the large tanβ limit to find sinα ∼ cosβ − λ7(v/M)2. In this case we can evaluate cos(β − α) to find approximately 2cosβ as above, but the more useful quantity would be the quantity that appears in the H vev. Because we have changed the sign of H1, we see that the vev of H is related to −cos(α + β), and this again evaluates to λ7(v/M)2. Alternatively had we taken a convention where we also changed the sign of sinα, we would have obtained the answers we did for small λ7 above. In either way of proceeding, the vev of the heavy field and sinα (up to an unphysical sign) take the same form, even when λ7 tanβ(v/M)2 > 1. These are the physically relevant quantity that enter the heavy Higgs coupling to two gauge bosons and the Yukawas. So our results

(6),(1) for the vev and mixing angle apply over the entire parameter range. An alternative approach to a two Higgs model with a heavy Higgs is to take an effective theory approach as considered in [2]. Ref. [2] does not assume the existence of a Z2 symmetry

(in fact H1 and H2 are never mentioned) so the Yukawa couplings of the heavy Higgs can be taken as free parameters, but the parameters were chosen to be consistent with small FCNC

(that is minimal flavor violation [5], assuming only a single Yukawa matrix structure for up type quarks and another for down type quarks). For simplicity in comparing to their results we will call their light Higgs H and their heavy Higgs S as in Ref. [2] (but note that H is now the light field and S is a doublet). Their Lagrangian is:

Note that g1 and g2 are couplings completely independent of gauge couplings; we have kept the notation of [2] for simplicity. Secondly, notice that all the same types of terms appear in the non-effective theory H1 H2 Lagrangian aside from the quadratic mass mixing

2We thank Howie Haber for discussions on this limit.

term. However, since H2 and H (from [2]) are not identical, the gs would be a function of various couplings in the Lagrangian above. We can expand in terms of cosβ to solve for one field in terms of the other. To simply relate couplings we can consider the small cosβ limit. In this limit, the heavy

Higgs is approximately H1 and the light Higgs is approximately H2. In this limit we can expand to see that g1 = λ. For the more exact result, we can expand H1 and H2 in terms of H and L and include the additional Z2-violating cosβ-suppressed terms to find g1 = λ. For simplicity, we concentrate on the λ7 term below. More relevantly for physical consequences, we can relate the vevs and in particular the heavy Higgs vev in the two pictures. Ref. [2] had 3

(again we are working to leading order in (v/M)2). Notice that H and L are real fields in the first analysis so that the relevant field to compare to is √ 2S (ignoring the other Higgs components, where H is the heavy Higgs in the fundamental theory).

Recall that when cosβ is small, λ7 ∼ g1. We see that the two values of the expectation value, though having the same parametric dependence, differ by a factor of -2. The reason for this is that the fundamental Higgs analysis uses the mass eigenstates for the full mass matrix, whereas the effective theory analysis did not use mass eigenstates once the g1-dependent quartic term is included. The physical mass eigenstate is S + 3g1/2(v/M)2H and has vev that agrees with the vev for the fundamental theory when g1 = λ. Eq. (12) tells us that without the m2 12 term that cosβ would agree with Eq. (14) above. However, the g1 quartic

(or in Ref. [3] the λ7-dependent quartic) also contributes to mass mixing, so the the heavy physical mass eigenstate has the vev cited in Eq. (6).

To further understand this result, it is of interest to consider the contributions of the quadratic and quartic terms to both mass mixing and vev. Had the only mixing term between H1 and H2 been a mass term, one could in fact simultaneously diagonalize the mass and vev. However, the relative mass squared coming from the quartic is 3/2g1(v/M)2, whereas the vev contribution to the linear term is g1/2(v/M)2v. So a piece of the quartic can be absorbed into M2A as is done in [3]. That is, the mass matrix takes the form

( sin2 β −sinβ cosβ

−sinβ cosβ cos2 β where M2A = sinβ cosβ − 12 v2(2λ5 + λ6 tanβ−1 + λ7 tanβ) and the off-diagonal part of B2 contains a term λ7v2 sin2 β. After full diagonalization, one is left with the vev of the heavy Higgs eignenstate cos(β − α) = λ(v/M)2 as we found above.

Before closing this section, we remark on how small the VEV of the second field is likely to be. This makes the coupling to two Ws very suppressed, which is essentially why the heavy Higgs search is quite difficult as we will discuss further shortly. In the next section we

3Note the sign correction to [2].

discuss the deviation of the light Higgs Yukawa from its Standard Model value. For a large range of parameters, this is the likely to be the best way to search for evidence of a second Higgs.

3 Yukawas

Given the expressions for H1 and H2 in terms of H and L, we can work out the Yukawas for the light and heavy fields to the up and down type quarks. In this section we will focus on precision light Higgs measurements and study the deviation of Higgs couplings to fermions from their Standard Model values. We will first consider Type I models (as in the MSSM) in which one Higgs gives mass to charged leptons and down-type quarks and the other Higgs gives mass to up-type quarks. We then have (in relation to the standard Yukawa couplings) [3,8]

(Parte **1** de 3)